 |
|
|
|||||||
|
OntologyEither/or, both/and, or neither/nor?1. "I think, therefore, I am." 2. "I am, therefore, I think." 3. "You are, therefore, I am." 4. "I interpret, therefore, I am." 5. "We are, therefore, we interpret." 6. "We think, therefore, we are." 7. "You are, therefore, I am not." 8. "We are, therefore, I am." 9. "We act, therefore, we exist." 10. "I am, you are, therefore, we are, maybe." posted by Jake at 4/05/2006 09:11:00 AM  
2 Comments: |
Friends w/ Blogs
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 My Reading Queue 
 
 
 
 Just Finished 
 
 
 The Looooong List 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 Previous Posts Devilish Hermeneutics ------------ Emergent is for Introverts, Too! ------------ Irreducible “undecidability” ------------ Emergent Seminarians ------------ Critical Contextualization (part two) ------------ Critical Contextualization ------------ Who's Feeding the Fishdog? ------------ Hmmmm... ------------ Being and Bearing Witness not Witnessing ------------ People and Programs ------------ Archives November 2004 December 2004 January 2005 February 2005 March 2005 April 2005 May 2005 June 2005 July 2005 August 2005 September 2005 October 2005 November 2005 December 2005 January 2006 February 2006 March 2006 April 2006 May 2006 June 2006 July 2006 August 2006 September 2006 October 2006 November 2006 December 2006 January 2007 February 2007 March 2007 April 2007 May 2007 June 2007
|
thank god we changed the subject
Descartes is so jealous.