|
My Silly DogWhile growing up, I had a beautiful black Labrador Retriever named Chessy. Chessy, like most labs was great with kids and generally of an amicable disposition. She tirelessly endured the playful abuse of my sister and me. Through it all… through trying to ride her across the yard like a miniature pony, through reenacting my favorite wrestling moves between Andre the Giant and Hacksaw Jim Dugan… she never once snapped at us nor bit us. She did, however, hold her joviality in abeyance while she was eating. When her food was set before her we knew not to bother her until she finished eating. Any deviation from this practice resulted in a slow, deep growl and a penetrating gaze that alerted everyone in my family not to screw around with her.Continue reading... I never quite figured out why she did this. Was it because she was embarrassed about her table manners, having resigned herself to eating from a bowl on the floor while the rest of the family ate at the table? Perhaps her mealtime despondency was a vestige of her wolfish ancestors and the survival instinct associated with competition for food? Whatever the reason, I learned that when she was given some space, Chessy was free to eat her meal without agitation. Conversely, something about perturbing her while she ate not only kept her from eating, but also threatened the rest of our family. Perhaps it is similar with dogmatic Fundamentalists. Let me say it stronger still: I think it is the same with such folk. I recall as a young theology student how defensive I became when my “liberal” professors and colleagues challenged my fragile presuppositions that bolstered, albeit precariously, my dogmatism. When antagonistic questions threatened the feeble foundations of my “orthodoxy,” the growl would begin as a low rumble deep within my soul and, sadly enough, I often verbally bit my antagonist. It was not until I was given space, often late at night with a theology book or early in the morning with my Bible, that my dogmatism began to wane. “What if God didn’t create the world in six literal days?” “Might partriarchal sexism be intricately interwoven into the fabric of the New Testament?” When I was alone with my thoughts I could explore, with greater profundity, such issues that threatened my tenacious fundamentalism. When I think back about how vehemently I fought against certain ideas in public and how, on a solitary jog around campus, I would wrestle with “Truth,” I am challenged to rethink the way that I interact with dogmatic Fundamentalists today. Maybe the best thing we can do for such folks is to pose a few questions and let them eat their supper in peace, undisturbed. Then we can allow them space, in their unguarded time, to think through these issues on their own. Hmmm? posted by Jake at 10/23/2005 01:36:00 PM 3 Comments: |
Friends w/ Blogs
My Reading Queue Just Finished The Looooong List Previous Posts Chris Seay in Atlanta ------------ Rethinking Baptistic Decorum ------------ My Saturday Church ------------ And all God's People Said? ------------ Ordination Fragen ------------ Old School/New School Community ------------ And So it Begins ------------ The Search to Belong ------------ Costa Rica ------------ Emergent Leaders respond to Critics ------------ Archives November 2004 December 2004 January 2005 February 2005 March 2005 April 2005 May 2005 June 2005 July 2005 August 2005 September 2005 October 2005 November 2005 December 2005 January 2006 February 2006 March 2006 April 2006 May 2006 June 2006 July 2006 August 2006 September 2006 October 2006 November 2006 December 2006 January 2007 February 2007 March 2007 April 2007 May 2007 June 2007
|
Now, when you say "Hacksaw Jim Dugan" are you implying you used a piece of wood to beat on your dog?
of course im always glad for wreslting references..the closest partners we have as theologians are wrestlers..no doubt..
now..im interested in how what you say (i agree..tis my experience as well) goes along with all the rage with emphasis on community..we learn and know in community..in some sense that is surely the case, but there is also a sense in which we only can learn, grow, change, etc., in private space.
I dont think we need to return to Locke for this, but we can at least acknowledge that this personal time is important (and hence the classic quiet time still has a place!).
interesting..peace
mark
Well put Mark. Even Jesus would often retreat by himself for times of extended prayer and communion with God.
To enter into private communion with the Godhead is not to remove ourselves from community, but rather to enter into a different community--the community of the divine.