About Me

A Church-Planter asking questions about God, Culture and Church
view my profile...

Jake recommends
Books
Films
Travel


Links






























Contact Me
Jake

Site Feed

Saturday, January 15, 2005

Ruth 2: Reflections (1:6-22)

(William Blake, Ruth the Dutiful Daughter in Law, 1803)
In our study this week we explored the complex relationship developed between these three women: Naomi, Ruth and Orpah. We discussed the depths of the women's losses and their relationship to one another in Iron I Age (1200-1000B.C.E.) Israel. We talked about the intricacy of family life during this time and about what it really meant to be a woman in this male-controlled world. Furthermore, we discussed the lunacy involved with Ruth's stubbornness to remain with Naomi against all odds. She has disobeyed her mother-in-law's plea and in doing so has chosen death over life--death to her own people, her own country, even her own gods! We also discussed the role that Orpah played in this scene. Is she an obedient, realistic woman or is she an evil and self serving rogue? Compare these two pictures. What strikes you about the manner in which Naomi, Ruth and Orpah are depicted? Do you agree with the artists' depictions? Why or why not?







(Armond Avanes, Ruth will not leave Naomi, 2000)
























It seems that these two paintings depict Orpah in distinct ways. Which one do you think captures the biblical text more faithfully?

In verses 20-22 we behold Naomi as she returns to her hometown of Bethlehem. In a world that defined women in relation to the men in their lives, how do you think Naomi felt when she returned home "empty"? How would you feel? How does this picture make you feel? Have things changed for women all that significantly? It seems that society still puts an enormous amount of pressure on women to have a boyfriend, husband, etc. Why do you think this is? We mentioned in class about the language Naomi uses when she enters into the city gates. She says, "I went away full but the Lord has brought me back empty." Is she indeed empty? This picture clearly shows Naomi accompanied by her daughter-in-law. Perhaps her "being brought back" by the Lord was done in the service of being refilled? Notice that she was "brought back". The storyteller is clear to note that this is not some whimsical okay-so-I-guess-I-will-go-home-now on Naomi's part. The Lord has brought her back and maybe her sorrow will be turned to gladness, her emptiness to abundance, her bitterness to sweetness? Tune in next week to see what happens as the barley harvest begins. (Bible Moralisée, Vienna, c.1122)

posted by Jake at 1/15/2005 10:41:00 AM

0 Comments:

Post a Comment

<< Home

Friends w/ Blogs









































































My Reading Queue





























Just Finished























The Looooong List
















































































































































































Previous Posts
Ruth 3: Reflections (2:1-23)
------------
Ruth 4: Reflections (3:1-18)
------------
Ruth 5: Reflections (4:1-12)
------------
Blogger anonymity
------------
The Barreto Admiration Society
------------
Can't we all just [not] get along?
------------
The Myth of a 'Pure Gospel'
------------
Worship at the Well
------------
Campolo on Emergent
------------
The Heresy of Inerrancy (Part 2)
------------

Archives
November 2004
December 2004
January 2005
February 2005
March 2005
April 2005
May 2005
June 2005
July 2005
August 2005
September 2005
October 2005
November 2005
December 2005
January 2006
February 2006
March 2006
April 2006
May 2006
June 2006
July 2006
August 2006
September 2006
October 2006
November 2006
December 2006
January 2007
February 2007
March 2007
April 2007
May 2007
June 2007

 

Powered by Blogger