|
Ruth 2: Reflections (1:6-22)(William Blake, Ruth the Dutiful Daughter in Law, 1803)In our study this week we explored the complex relationship developed between these three women: Naomi, Ruth and Orpah. We discussed the depths of the women's losses and their relationship to one another in Iron I Age (1200-1000B.C.E.) Israel. We talked about the intricacy of family life during this time and about what it really meant to be a woman in this male-controlled world. Furthermore, we discussed the lunacy involved with Ruth's stubbornness to remain with Naomi against all odds. She has disobeyed her mother-in-law's plea and in doing so has chosen death over life--death to her own people, her own country, even her own gods! We also discussed the role that Orpah played in this scene. Is she an obedient, realistic woman or is she an evil and self serving rogue? Compare these two pictures. What strikes you about the manner in which Naomi, Ruth and Orpah are depicted? Do you agree with the artists' depictions? Why or why not? (Armond Avanes, Ruth will not leave Naomi, 2000) It seems that these two paintings depict Orpah in distinct ways. Which one do you think captures the biblical text more faithfully? In verses 20-22 we behold Naomi as she returns to her hometown of Bethlehem. In a world that defined women in relation to the men in their lives, how do you think Naomi felt when she returned home "empty"? How would you feel? How does this picture make you feel? Have things changed for women all that significantly? It seems that society still puts an enormous amount of pressure on women to have a boyfriend, husband, etc. Why do you think this is? We mentioned in class about the language Naomi uses when she enters into the city gates. She says, "I went away full but the Lord has brought me back empty." Is she indeed empty? This picture clearly shows Naomi accompanied by her daughter-in-law. Perhaps her "being brought back" by the Lord was done in the service of being refilled? Notice that she was "brought back". The storyteller is clear to note that this is not some whimsical okay-so-I-guess-I-will-go-home-now on Naomi's part. The Lord has brought her back and maybe her sorrow will be turned to gladness, her emptiness to abundance, her bitterness to sweetness? Tune in next week to see what happens as the barley harvest begins. (Bible Moralisée, Vienna, c.1122) posted by Jake at 1/15/2005 10:41:00 AM 0 Comments: |
Friends w/ Blogs
My Reading Queue Just Finished The Looooong List Previous Posts Ruth 3: Reflections (2:1-23) ------------ Ruth 4: Reflections (3:1-18) ------------ Ruth 5: Reflections (4:1-12) ------------ Blogger anonymity ------------ The Barreto Admiration Society ------------ Can't we all just [not] get along? ------------ The Myth of a 'Pure Gospel' ------------ Worship at the Well ------------ Campolo on Emergent ------------ The Heresy of Inerrancy (Part 2) ------------ Archives November 2004 December 2004 January 2005 February 2005 March 2005 April 2005 May 2005 June 2005 July 2005 August 2005 September 2005 October 2005 November 2005 December 2005 January 2006 February 2006 March 2006 April 2006 May 2006 June 2006 July 2006 August 2006 September 2006 October 2006 November 2006 December 2006 January 2007 February 2007 March 2007 April 2007 May 2007 June 2007
|